The Madras High Court has strongly criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED), likening it to a limpet mine dependent on a ‘ship’ of predicate offense. The court quashed ED’s ₹901-crore fixed deposit freeze order, emphasizing that PMLA actions require a scheduled offense and proceeds of crime.
The Madras High Court has strongly criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED), likening it to a limpet mine dependent on a ‘ship’ of predicate offense. The court quashed ED’s ₹901-crore fixed deposit freeze order, emphasizing that PMLA actions require a scheduled offense and proceeds of crime. The Madras High Court has strongly criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED), likening it to a limpet mine dependent on a ‘ship’ of predicate offense. The court quashed ED’s ₹901-crore fixed deposit freeze order, emphasizing that PMLA actions require a scheduled offense and proceeds of crime.
