The Supreme Court has ruled that denying prisoners, including those with disabilities, preferred food items does not violate fundamental rights, emphasizing adequate and nutritious food is sufficient. The court highlighted the need for prison reforms, especially concerning disability-sensitive infrastructure and healthcare, while acknowledging outdated prison manuals and the state’s obligation to protect disabled prisoners’ rights.
The Supreme Court has ruled that denying prisoners, including those with disabilities, preferred food items does not violate fundamental rights, emphasizing adequate and nutritious food is sufficient. The court highlighted the need for prison reforms, especially concerning disability-sensitive infrastructure and healthcare, while acknowledging outdated prison manuals and the state’s obligation to protect disabled prisoners’ rights. The Supreme Court has ruled that denying prisoners, including those with disabilities, preferred food items does not violate fundamental rights, emphasizing adequate and nutritious food is sufficient. The court highlighted the need for prison reforms, especially concerning disability-sensitive infrastructure and healthcare, while acknowledging outdated prison manuals and the state’s obligation to protect disabled prisoners’ rights.
